
Five cost layers, one formula and three scenarios — a 36-month model that survives contact with procurement.

Cloud comparisons frequently begin with CPU, memory and storage. That’s useful — but it isn’t TCO.
A meaningful three-year cloud comparison should capture the cost ofrunning, protecting, connecting, supporting and operating the workload.
Document the actual requirement:
Then model that requirement for36 months.
Calculate:
Don’t assume today’s capacity remains constant. If storage grows 20% annually, model that growth.
Add:
These aren’t optional extras for most production enterprise systems. They are part of the production architecture.
Understand applicable charges associated with:
The exact charging model varies between providers. The important principle is to model the expected behaviour of the application.
Infrastructure doesn’t operate itself. Include:
If these activities are performed internally, they still have a cost.
Include one-time expenditure:
A cheaper monthly platform can still produce a more expensive project if migration complexity is significantly higher.
A simplified model is:
A useful financial model should include scenarios.
This exposes which pricing models transfer more financial risk to the customer.
If one proposal includes backup, security, support and management while another doesn’t, normalise the comparison before making a decision.
Cost matters. But enterprise infrastructure must also deliver availability, performance, security, compliance and operational resilience. The goal should therefore be:
Use YallaCloud cloud cost and TCO tools to model infrastructure beyond the headline VM price.